Yes — especially if your app handles personal data, authentication, or payments. Vulnerabilities in early-stage code tend to grow, mutate, and become harder to fix later. A light-weight test now saves time and reputation later.

The usual suspects:

• Broken access controls (users accessing other people’s data)

• Session mismanagement

• Insecure APIs

• Input handling issues that can lead to injection or logic abuse

You’d be surprised how often we find critical issues… in production apps with users.

Frameworks help — but they’re not foolproof. We regularly test apps built on Django, Laravel, or React with critical flaws. Security features can be misconfigured, bypassed, or just not applied consistently.

It depends on the scope, but here’s a simple flow:

1. You tell us which app, which features, and which roles we should test
2. We manually assess authentication, business logic, and API interactions
3. We find the weak spots — and show you how we did it
4. You get a report, remediation advice, and retesting as needed

We work with your developers, not against them.

Automated scanners are like smoke detectors. Useful — but they don’t replace someone actually trying to break into your app.

We combine manual testing with tooling, so you get the best of both. A scanner won’t notice if a user can download someone else’s invoice or modify a booking link.

Not if you build it in early. We recommend:

• A short test before big releases (auth, payment, role changes)

• Regular testing every 6–12 months

• Spot checks during critical sprints

Think of it as part of your QA lifecycle — it just deals with attackers, not bugs.

If you ticked less than 3… you’re flying blind.